Since Donald Trump took office as president, Colorado has joined several legal battles against his administration’s executive orders and policies.
Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat running for governor in 2026, has filed multiple lawsuits and supported other legal challenges through amicus briefs.
Here’s a breakdown of Colorado’s legal actions against the Trump administration.
Challenging Birthright Citizenship Policy
On his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order ending birthright citizenship in the U.S. Colorado, along with other states, filed a lawsuit on January 21, arguing that the order violates the 14th Amendment.
The 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States… are citizens of the United States.” Colorado’s lawsuit seeks to block the order and ensure that birthright citizenship remains protected.
Several judges have temporarily halted the enforcement of Trump’s order while the case is in court.
Fighting the Freeze on Federal Funds
On January 27, the Office of Management and Budget froze all federal funding. The next day, Colorado and over 20 other states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, arguing that the freeze was illegal and harmful.
Attorney General Weiser stated that this move violates the separation of powers and negatively impacts health care, education, and public safety.
Several judges have issued temporary orders allowing federal funding to continue while the lawsuit proceeds.
Lawsuit Against Data Privacy Violations
On February 7, Weiser joined a lawsuit against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk, accusing them of illegally accessing private taxpayer data.
The case, filed in New York, alleges that the Trump administration gave DOGE unauthorized access to sensitive Treasury Department records, including Social Security numbers and bank details.
Colorado and other states argue that this data-sharing violates privacy laws and puts citizens at risk. A New York judge has temporarily blocked DOGE from accessing federal systems while the lawsuit is ongoing.
Opposing Cuts to Medical Research Funding
On February 7, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that it would stop reimbursing research institutions at previously agreed rates.
This decision would cut nearly $90 million in research funding for Colorado universities.
In response, Weiser and 21 other attorneys general filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts, arguing that the funding cuts violate the Administrative Procedures Act. A judge has issued a temporary block on the cuts while the case moves forward.
Protecting Gender-Affirming Care
On January 28, Trump issued an executive order threatening to withdraw federal funding from medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care to minors.
Colorado joined Washington, Minnesota, and Oregon in filing a lawsuit to block the order.
The lawsuit, filed in Washington, claims that the order violates the 5th Amendment’s equal protection clause by discriminating against transgender individuals.
Due to the order, some hospitals in Colorado canceled scheduled treatments for transgender youth. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the order, calling it “blatant discrimination.”
Read More:
- A ‘Heartbreaking’ Turn: Elderly Florida Woman Faces Prison for Husband’s Mercy Killing
- Florida License Renewal Rules Updated – What It Means for You?
Supporting Other Legal Challenges
Aside from filing lawsuits, Colorado has supported legal actions taken by other states and organizations. Attorney General Weiser has filed amicus briefs supporting:
- A lawsuit by federal worker unions against Trump’s “Fork in the Road” buyout program.
- A case defending the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after the Trump administration tried to halt its operations.
- Legal efforts to uphold gun control measures, including restrictions on firearm modifications and expanded background check requirements.
Conclusion
Colorado has taken a strong stance against several Trump administration policies, joining lawsuits and legal efforts to challenge executive actions.
These cases, which address key issues like citizenship, federal funding, data privacy, medical research, and transgender rights, are still being decided in court.
The outcomes of these legal battles could have lasting effects on state and national policies.
Disclaimer- Our team has thoroughly fact-checked this article to ensure its accuracy and maintain its credibility. We are committed to providing honest and reliable content for our readers.
+ There are no comments
Add yours