The ongoing dispute between Disney and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ appointees regarding control of Walt Disney World’s government services will be settled in a court hearing scheduled for July 25 in Orlando.
Disney alleges that DeSantis and his appointees took over the district governing Disney World in response to the company’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law, enacted in 2022.
This law prohibits discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity in early-grade classrooms, a stance that DeSantis vigorously supported.
The conflict escalated when Disney challenged the state’s takeover of the district, which provides essential services like planning and firefighting at Disney World. The company claims that the governor’s actions were retaliation for its stance on the controversial legislation.
Despite Disney’s legal challenge, DeSantis and his appointees scored an initial victory when a federal judge dismissed Disney’s free speech lawsuit against them in January. Undeterred, Disney has decided to appeal this decision, prolonging the legal battle over control of the district.
The court hearing in July will determine whether the case should proceed to a full trial or be resolved without the need for further litigation. Until then, the fate of Walt Disney World’s governance remains uncertain, with both sides gearing up for what could be a protracted legal battle.
As the legal battle between Disney and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis’ appointees unfolds, the upcoming July hearing will likely shed light on the future of Walt Disney World’s government.
Related Articles:
- Local Teen’s Battle with Lyme Disease: A Warning for Others
- HIV Prevention Meds Available Without Prescription: Governor Newsom’s Decision
- Four Men Fatally Shot at Local Car Wash in Alabama
Both sides await a resolution, with Disney alleging retaliation over political disputes, while DeSantis maintains his administration’s actions were justified.
The outcome of this clash could have significant implications not only for Disney but also for the broader relationship between corporations and state governance.
+ There are no comments
Add yours